I am pleased to announce that Mono C# compiler (gmcs) has now full C# 3.0 support. Most of the features has been available since Mono 1.2.6 release. However, with the upcoming Mono 2.0 release we will also support complex LINQ expressions and mainly expression trees which is fairly overlooked new feature with a lot of potential.

For anyone interested in compiling and running this LukeH’s slightly extreme LINQ example I have good news. It compiles on Mono and it runs as fast as on .NET.

Lightweight REST framework for Java

Do you want to embrace the architecture of the Web and benefit from its simplicity and scalability? Leverage our innovative REST engine and start blending your Web Sites and Web Services into uniform Web Applications!

Java is making things more lightweight now with lots of emerging kits that compete with other web ready platforms like Python, Ruby, .NET, PHP etc. After this many years things get bloated and need to be simplified.  I think this will start winning people over in this direction.

Of course this is just a heuristic check and only finds out if your application on the surface has issues with running on a mono platform such as calls to p/invoke to windows apis or unsafe code that uses native calls but it is a great place to start.

The Mono Migration Analyzer (MoMA) tool helps you identify issues you may have when porting your .Net application to Mono. It helps pinpoint platform specific calls (P/Invoke) and areas that are not yet supported by the Mono project.

While MoMA can help show potential issues, there are many complex factors that cannot be covered by a simple tool. MoMA may fail to point out areas that will cause problems, and may point out areas which will not actually be an issue.

Use the results provided as a guide to get you started on porting your application, but remember the true test is actually running your application on Mono.

For a description of the errors that MoMA detects and how to deal with them, see MoMA – Issue Descriptions.

I have recently been really interested in making platforms and applications that aren’t limited by the OS they are contained in.  Thus mono is a very interesting platform now that it supports 2.0 fully and all the generic goodness to limit boxing/unboxing, common code between .net 2.0 apps (which are pretty much mainstream now) and developing for more of a standard that ensures your apps are portable.

Granted .NET 3.0 and 3.5 (pretty much the same version really with the addition of new frameworks such as WCF, LINQ which is very cool and functional as well as Silverlight) but most places deployed code is still .NET 2.0 and the poor souls working on very constricting .NET 1.0 and 1.1.

Also, recently Moonlight the Mono version of Silverlight has been released for alpha.

Here is a list of the Tenjin Templating engines:

• pyTenjin
• phpTenjin
• rbTenjin
• jsTenjin
• plTenjin

Changes

(Python) (Ruby) (PHP) (Perl) (JavaScript)

User’s Guide

(Python) (Ruby) (PHP) (Perl) (JavaScript)

FAQ

(Python) (Ruby) (PHP) (Perl) (JavaScript)

Examples

(Python) (Ruby) (PHP) (Perl) (JavaScript)

Presentation

2007 LL Spirit LightningTalk (full-version) (Japanese)

Here is what the template markup looks like:

This

<table>
<tbody>
<?py i = 0 ?>
<?py for item in ['<foo>', 'bar&bar', '"baz"']: ?>
<?py     i += 1 ?>
<tr>
<td>#{item}</td>
<td>${item}</td>
</tr>
<?py #end ?>
<tbody>

</table>

Produces This

<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><foo></td>
<td>&lt;foo&gt;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>bar&bar</td>
<td>bar&amp;bar</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>"baz"</td>
<td>&quot;baz&quot;</td>
</tr>
<tbody>
</table>

Here are some speed results

PureMVC is a lightweight framework  for creating applications based
upon the classic Model-View-Controller design meta-pattern.
This free, open-source framework is implemented in ActionScript 2 and
3, Java, C# and a number of other popular programming languages.
This allows development on a wide variety of platforms including:

• Mobile Environments: FlashLite, .NET Compact Framework, J2ME
• Server Environments: ColdFusion, J2EE, PHP, Python
• Browser Environments: Flash/Flex, JavaFX, Silverlight
• Desktop Environments: .NET, AIR, FLASH, J2SE

For Flex PureMVC happens to be my favorite MVC kit.  I only use one if absolutely necessary but PureMVC keeps it clean.  The great thing is that is works with or without Flex unlike Cairngorm and it is always up to date.  It is just an added bonus that is spans so many other platforms. There are a few things I don’t like about it in other platforms like the url naming but it is much better than kits out there now and Microsoft’s ASP.NET MVC most likely wont’ be cross platform *wink*.

Some info on the PureMVC framework (caution PDF):

• Goals & Benefits
• Conceptual Diagram
• Framework Overview
• Best Practices

PureMVC Manifold

• Documentation
• Project Owners
• Repositories
• Get Involved!

Ports

• ActionScript 2
• ActionScript 3
• C#
• ColdFusion
• Java
• Perl
• PHP
• Python
• Ruby
• Propose a Port

Optimization can be evil, but solid base starting points are desired. Many times formal knowledge can be as needed as logical or physical separation and understanding service and standards format layering in your applications for the best evolution and versioning as well as performance. Formal engineering is what is separating companies like Google from the pack. Do you do formal?

Orders of common functions

Here is a list of classes of functions that are commonly encountered when analyzing algorithms. All of these are as n increases to infinity. The slower-growing functions are listed first. c is an arbitrary constant.

Notation	Name	Example
	constant	Determining if a number is even or odd
	inverse Ackermann	Amortized time per operation when using a disjoint-set (union-find) data structure
	iterated logarithmic	The find algorithm of Hopcroft and Ullman on a disjoint set
	logarithmic	Finding an item in a sorted list with the binary search algorithm
	polylogarithmic	Deciding if n is prime with the AKS primality test
	fractional power	searching in a kd-tree
	linear	Finding an item in an unsorted list
	linearithmic, loglinear, or quasilinear	Sorting a list with heapsort, computing a FFT
	quadratic	Sorting a list with insertion sort, computing a DFT
	polynomial, sometimes called algebraic	Finding the shortest path on a weighted digraph with the Floyd-Warshall algorithm
	exponential, sometimes called geometric	Finding the (exact) solution to the traveling salesman problem (under the assumption that P ≠ NP)
	factorial, sometimes called combinatorial	Determining if two logical statements are equivalent[1], traveling salesman problem, or any other NP-complete problem via brute-force search, finding the determinant of a matrix with expansion by minors
	n to the n
	double exponential	Finding a complete set of associative-commutative unifiers[2]

Not as common, but even larger growth is possible, such as the single-valued version of the Ackermann function, A(n,n). Conversely, extremely slowly-growing functions such as the inverse of this function, often denoted α(n), are possible. Although unbounded, these functions are often regarded as being constant factors for all practical purposes.

JSON-RPC is the answer to the argument that XML RPC is too verbose and bloated and convoluted.  JSON is just about as simple as you can get in data formats and it is becoming a great baseplane standard and is a tool that spans many platforms.

“Does distributed computing have to be any harder than this? I don’t think so.”

Can it be even simpler ?

JSON-RPC is lightweight remote procedure call protocol similar to XML-RPC. It’s designed to be simple!

• specification
• python package implementing JSON-RPC
• more implementations
• services
• about JSON-RPC

JavaScript

• There is a JSON-RPC implementations as part of JavaScript O Lait jsolait.
  You can also find some live examples
• The Open Source TelePort Library supports JSON-RPC as well as other RPC protocols.
  Live demos and documentation can be found here.
• JSON-RPC to Java bridge includes a JavaScript client.
• Dojo Toolkit 0.3 implements JSON RPC.
• JSON/XML-RPC Client Implementation which abstracts-away the differences between JSON-RPC and XML-RPC and permits cross-site requests.

C

• JSON-RPC C Bridge. There is also support for GoAhead WebServers.

C#

• .NET and ASP.NET

Erlang

• YAWS JSON-RPC module (HTTP client/server)

Java

• JSON-RPC to Java bridge
• JRP

Lisp

• Common Lisp

Lua

• Lua

Perl

• Catalyst using the JSONRPC plugin
• JSON module

Php

• JSON-PHP
• php-json
• PHP-O-Lait
• Phpxmlrpc (in the ‘extras’ package)
• SCA_SDO Pecl Package
• JSON_RPC_Server, a JSON-RPC implementation in PHP
• JSON/XML-RPC Server Implementation which abstracts-away the differences between JSON-RPC and XML-RPC.

Python

• A python package which implements the JSON-RPC specs. It includes an mod_python handler, a CGIHandler, a TCP server and (soon) a ServiceProxies implementation.
• CherryPy (python)
• Zope 2
• Zope 3
• Twisted JSON-RPC – Web, Web2, and TCP

Ruby

• Ruby

Frameworks

• Catalyst (Perl) using the JSONRPC plugin
• CherryPy (python)
• JRP
• .NET and ASP.NET
• Zope 2
• Zope 3

So now we have Google (They employ Guido), Microsoft (IronPython) and Sun (Jython) all turning into Python-istas. Does this mean Python is destined for greatness in the near future? Well I recommend learning it. It is a great language and it has a high productivity rate. Time will tell if it has the ability to be in extremely large code bases. I think it is just a matter of the architecture and organization as with any project.

Jonathan Schwartz at Sun mentioned also taking the “J” out of “JVM” to just make a VM much like a .NET framework. So Microsoft copied Java with C# the JVM and added multiple languages. Then Sun comes back and added multiple byte code compiled languages. And then they both focus on dynamic engines to implement versions of Python, Microsoft doing this within their DLR.

Many times the larger market languages that end up running business or “enterprisey” are heavily influenced by companies, in addition to the other demands from consumers, which here is programmers. So when the big three are all banking on Python as a draw there is a definite market draw there and a tell on the future. But I think it is apparent that Python is becoming a standard market baseplane language.

It is great to be able to use other libraries from .net with IronPython and java libraries with Jython. It has found a way to integrate with the current infrastructure and the language has low bar entry but deep benefits. Python is snaking its way into the market.

Python is so non verbose…

import sys
import clr
from System.IO import Path, Directory, FileInfodir = Path.Combine(sys.prefix, 'DLLs')

if Directory.Exists(dir):
    sys.path.append(dir)
    files = Directory.GetFiles(dir)
    for file in files:
        if file.lower().endswith('.dll'):
            try:
                clr.AddReference(FileInfo(file).Name)
            except:
                pass

This sample is from IronPython showing adding dynamic references to all dlls loaded.

Check out this HTML/XHTML parser in pure Python.

from HTMLParser import HTMLParserclass MyHTMLParser(HTMLParser):
def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):
print "Encountered the beginning of a %s tag" % tag
def handle_endtag(self, tag):
print "Encountered the end of a %s tag" % tag


baseplane: In software development, a set of tools, systems, patterns and designs that allow a system to be easily transferred to many back ends, services or front ends using standards, patterns and ideally non platform specific tools. Typically the baseplane includes both open standards and market standards based on industry usage. A baseplane may also be a way to commonize output to allow better designer and developer production.

A baseplane is a word I termed to describe the current, most technologically advanced set of tools and patterns that are usable across all major programming platforms.

The idea is that a company or programmer is sometimes held hostage by a particular platform or developer mindshare. People loving a good competition boast about platforms over other platforms and how one is better than the other. It is all fun and games but it doesn’t really give you the ‘best’ patterns and solutions. By patterns I mean general patterns not design patterns specifically for OO programming.

The ideal situation is where software is built semantically and from user perspectives with simplified enterprise entities and collections that perform top notch in a data store, no matter the platform or the language used to create it.

That is where true solutions begin, when companies and individuals can use the best platform or framework no matter their legion. A baseplane is a way to create systems that work well in many systems.

For instance JSON is a great example, this allows a layer to make back ends any language and then the front end any presentation from apps, to web to flash to whatever.

There will be more on this but the tools on this site all have this in mind.

Microsoft Office Binary (doc, xls, ppt) File Formats

Published: February 15, 2008

The documents listed below are covered by the Microsoft Open Specification Promise.

Microsoft Word

Word 97-2007 Binary File Format (.doc) Specification PDF | XPS

Microsoft PowerPoint

PowerPoint 97-2007 Binary File Format (.ppt) Specification PDF | XPS

Microsoft Excel

Excel 97-2007 Binary File Format (.xls) Specification PDF | XPS

Excel 2007 Binary File Format (.xlsb) Specification PDF | XPS

Office Drawing

Office Drawing 97-2007 Binary Format Specification PDF | XPS

Supporting Technologies

See Supporting Technologies

Yes you have reached the twilight zone… do-de-do-do.